É normal ser negativo?
Versão Imprimível
É normal ser negativo?
acho q nao kra,talvez se vc for bem nit deve ser.. pq vc costuma ganhar grandes pots no SD dai..
so completando...acho um jogador fraco,ruim q n ganha sem SD...por mais nit q seja.. ;)
Tambem acho que, quanto mais LAG o kra for, maior esse numero.
E quanto mais TAG, menor.
Mas talvez seja um leak no meu jogo tambem, porque o meu eh BEM negativo.
o meu é negativo também.
mas é isso ai, qnt mais lag maior. (desde q vc seja vencedor obvio.)
Citação:
Postado originalmente por PedroYnoue
serio?vai ve eu sou negativo tb entao ahuhuauha vo ver isso..
qual q e a sigla pa ver isso em?
WTSD%
W$SD%
W$SD%
W$woSD seria esse? ta negativo o meu tb uhaehueuh noob
Sim, eh absurdamente negativo a parada :DCitação:
Postado originalmente por lagostinha
eu n vi pelo grafico..vi no reports e lol, to 1,2k negativo em 45k hands ehee
Uns dias atras eu tava atras do pq, tava lendo o forum da cr. Copiei e colei , é a resposta do fabian num topico da cr, pra quem não sabe ele é pro da cr.
The tighter you are overall (particularly postflop, but the correlation is often very strong between preflop and postflop here), the more you tend to win at showdown and the more you tend to lose at non-showdown. The looser you are, the more you tend to win at non-showdown, and the more you tend to lose at showdown. This is true between a range of reasonable stats, perhaps between 15/10 up to 30/25 or so, not too sure about playing styles outside this range.
The reasoning should be fairly intuitive. Assume you're a very tight player (a 15/10) with a similarly conservative postflop game. If you flop middle pair no kicker and someone bets into you, are you continuing with the hand? No, right? You just lost some money in a non-showdown pot, and it's going to be happening A LOT. Then when you make the monster hand necessary to continue, you're probably going to win at showdown (assuming you get there), right? Your showdown winnings just went up.
The reverse is also true. Let's say the 30/25 player is the 15/10 player's opponent in the above examples. He's betting perhaps every flop with his entire range, and the 15/10 isn't going to continue unless his hand is very strong. The end result is a whole bunch of smaller pots won without showdown for the loose player who puts pressure on the tighter player. The loose player's WWSF stat in pokertracker is going to be through the roof. But at showdown, the tight player's average hand will be way, way stronger than the loose player's, so he'll tend to win a lot in pots that go to showdown. The tight player's W$SD stat in pokertracker is going to be through the roof.
This is, as usual, rather simplified. You can't just cbet and double barrel every single flop and turn and wait for your non-showdown winnings to skyrocket as your weak/tight opponents fold and fold and fold. But I think it's a good and intuitive illustration of how showdown money will tend to flow to the tighter player and non-showdown money will tend to flow to the looser player.
All the above assumes you play at least "reasonably well" with your particular style, and by that I basically mean you don't make horrible retarded obvious mistakes and isn't a huge fish. Oh and I'm also talking about 6max, but the same principles (though not the same numbers) should hold in full ring too.