Spin & Go PokerStars

[gifs1706]

O nível é baixo, mas o rake é mto alto pra valer a pena. Se o PS diminuir o rake e redistribuir melhor os prizes, com certeza vai valer a pena pq os donkeys tão td jogando essa porcaria.
Action nos husng tá uma merda desde que começou esses spin and go.

[RenzoBR]

410 de $1 por enquanto... Daqui pouco começa o grind de hoje...

[r.uruguay]

Quem gosta d um HU c da bem,ñ é dificil,mas é bom ter uma gestão de br boa.

[Stolf]

E agora? Pokerstars aumentou o rake e mudou os multiplicadores. Pra onde vai a variância?

Já podemos considerar jogo de azar e proibir Spin e go no Brasil?

[iti]

Achei engraçado que na época que cortaram dobro ou nada alegaram que não era poker. Agora fazem uma roleta camuflada e divulgam até em rede nacional a nova modalidade do esporte da mente

[lotecaxsv]

Agora com os Prize Pool maiores, esses jogos continuam não grindaveis?
Alguem poderia mostrar alguns cálculos com esses novos valores de prize pool.

[Jhonnyweed]

Agora com os Prize Pool maiores, esses jogos continuam não grindaveis?
Alguem poderia mostrar alguns cálculos com esses novos valores de prize pool.

Qual eh o novo valor?

Sent from my GT-S5310B using MaisEV mobile app

[Stolf]

Agora com os Prize Pool maiores, esses jogos continuam não grindaveis?
Alguem poderia mostrar alguns cálculos com esses novos valores de prize pool.

Ainda pior.

Two Plus Two Poker Forums - View Single Post - ** Official Spin and Go's Discussion Thread **


Nova Estrutura
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Effective Specified Simulation
Place Finish Distribution Finish Distribution
1 0,00036% 0,000361%
2 0,00032% 0,000343%
3 0,00032% 0,000297%
4 0,0018% 0,001784%
5 0,0016% 0,001624%
6 0,0016% 0,001561%
7 0,0036% 0,003589%
8 0,0032% 0,003209%
9 0,0032% 0,003184%
10 0,036% 0,035848%
11 0,18% 0,180022%
12 2,7% 2,698898%
13 7,69176% 7,691714%
14 25,38648% 25,381828%
ITM 36,01024% 36,00426%
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1000 simulations of 200000 games
Expected ROI (with 20% rakeback): 3,56% (7120 Buyins)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
99% had ROI below 7,54% (15072 Buyins)
97.5% had ROI below 6,90% (13802 Buyins)
95% had ROI below 5,97% (11943 Buyins)
90% had ROI below 5,41% (10826 Buyins)
80% had ROI below 4,51% (9017 Buyins)
70% had ROI below 4,04% (8081 Buyins)
60% had ROI below 3,74% (7480 Buyins)
50% had ROI below 3,37% (6739 Buyins)
40% had ROI below 2,93% (5862 Buyins)
30% had ROI below 2,64% (5274 Buyins)
20% had ROI below 2,37% (4734 Buyins)
10% had ROI below 2,09% (4182 Buyins)
5% had ROI below 1,90% (3798 Buyins)
2.5% had ROI below 1,75% (3503 Buyins)
1% had ROI below 1,54% (3071 Buyins)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
99% had a downswing greater than 196 buyins
97.5% had a downswing greater than 210 buyins
95% had a downswing greater than 221 buyins
90% had a downswing greater than 234 buyins
80% had a downswing greater than 253 buyins
70% had a downswing greater than 272 buyins
60% had a downswing greater than 287 buyins
50% had a downswing greater than 306 buyins
40% had a downswing greater than 322 buyins
30% had a downswing greater than 346 buyins
20% had a downswing greater than 375 buyins
10% had a downswing greater than 431 buyins
5% had a downswing greater than 470 buyins
2.5% had a downswing greater than 529 buyins
1% had a downswing greater than 564 buyins
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
99% had a low point lower than 0 buyins
97.5% had a low point lower than -1 buyins
95% had a low point lower than -2 buyins
90% had a low point lower than -7 buyins
80% had a low point lower than -14 buyins
70% had a low point lower than -23 buyins
60% had a low point lower than -34 buyins
50% had a low point lower than -45 buyins
40% had a low point lower than -61 buyins
30% had a low point lower than -77 buyins
20% had a low point lower than -103 buyins
10% had a low point lower than -144 buyins
5% had a low point lower than -190 buyins
2.5% had a low point lower than -244 buyins
1% had a low point lower than -294 buyins






Estrutura antiga
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Effective Specified Simulation
Place Finish Distribution Finish Distribution
1 0,0018% 0,001841%
2 0,0016% 0,001591%
3 0,0016% 0,001618%
4 0,0036% 0,003575%
5 0,0032% 0,003255%
6 0,0032% 0,00317%
7 0,0054% 0,005422%
8 0,0048% 0,004844%
9 0,0048% 0,004708%
10 0,0288% 0,028704%
11 0,36% 0,360821%
12 2,88% 2,879392%
13 6,4836% 6,483323%
14 26,2368% 26,23637%
ITM 36,0192% 36,018634%
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1000 simulations of 200000 games
Expected ROI (with 20% rakeback): 4,41% (8824 Buyins)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
99% had ROI below 7,17% (14347 Buyins)
97.5% had ROI below 6,66% (13330 Buyins)
95% had ROI below 6,32% (12632 Buyins)
90% had ROI below 5,85% (11707 Buyins)
80% had ROI below 5,37% (10743 Buyins)
70% had ROI below 4,98% (9961 Buyins)
60% had ROI below 4,65% (9303 Buyins)
50% had ROI below 4,39% (8783 Buyins)
40% had ROI below 4,15% (8292 Buyins)
30% had ROI below 3,85% (7703 Buyins)
20% had ROI below 3,52% (7044 Buyins)
10% had ROI below 3,12% (6248 Buyins)
5% had ROI below 2,77% (5542 Buyins)
2.5% had ROI below 2,54% (5087 Buyins)
1% had ROI below 2,34% (4681 Buyins)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
99% had a downswing greater than 203 buyins
97.5% had a downswing greater than 212 buyins
95% had a downswing greater than 228 buyins
90% had a downswing greater than 247 buyins
80% had a downswing greater than 268 buyins
70% had a downswing greater than 289 buyins
60% had a downswing greater than 307 buyins
50% had a downswing greater than 324 buyins
40% had a downswing greater than 342 buyins
30% had a downswing greater than 370 buyins
20% had a downswing greater than 399 buyins
10% had a downswing greater than 446 buyins
5% had a downswing greater than 486 buyins
2.5% had a downswing greater than 520 buyins
1% had a downswing greater than 586 buyins
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
99% had a low point lower than 0 buyins
97.5% had a low point lower than -1 buyins
95% had a low point lower than -3 buyins
90% had a low point lower than -7 buyins
80% had a low point lower than -15 buyins
70% had a low point lower than -26 buyins
60% had a low point lower than -36 buyins
50% had a low point lower than -49 buyins
40% had a low point lower than -63 buyins
30% had a low point lower than -86 buyins
20% had a low point lower than -113 buyins
10% had a low point lower than -157 buyins
5% had a low point lower than -200 buyins
2.5% had a low point lower than -260 buyins
1% had a low point lower than -316 buyins
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Stolf]

[lftein]

@RenzoBR, continua grindando isso?? Como está?